Post by account_disabled on Dec 20, 2023 0:53:38 GMT -5
The hours of daily rest provided for in Article . In justified cases due to objective, technical or work organization conditions, a minimum rest period of hours can be established. Article of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union provides that: ( ) Every worker has the right to working conditions that respect health, safety and his dignity. ( ) Every worker has the right to a limitation of the maximum working time and rest periods daily and weekly, as well as an annual period of paid leave. B. Portuguese Law At article paragraph , the Portuguese Civil Code of provides: The worker is entitled to at least one rest day per week. Article of the said code provides at paragraph : In each week or in certain weeks.
of the year, a half-day or a day of rest may be granted, apart from the country email list weekly day of rest provided by law. Article paragraph of that code provides: A period of hours is added to the mandatory weekly rest day, which corresponds to the minimum daily rest period provided for in Article . Article of the Portuguese Civil Code of provides at paragraphs and : . The worker is entitled to at least one rest day per week. . An additional weekly rest period, continuous or discontinuous, for all or some of the weeks of the year can be recognized through a collective bargaining instrument or under the employment contract. Paragraphs and of article of the mentioned code are drafted as follows: . The mandatory weekly rest period and the -hour daily rest period provided for in Article must be granted continuously. . The -hour period referred to in the previous paragraph is considered included, in whole or in part, in the additional weekly rest.
That is granted in continuation of the mandatory weekly rest. The actual situation The appellant in the main litigation, Mr. Maio Marques da Rosa, was employed from to – from , as a cashier – by the respondent company, Varzim Sol – Turismo, Jogo e Animação SA, which owns and operates a casino in Portugal. The casino is open every day for a certain number of hours, from afternoon to morning, with the exception of December and . On the date of the facts in the main litigation, the work schedule of the Varzim Sol employees who worked in the gaming halls provided for two consecutive days of rest. The cashiers, including the appellant, worked in rotation within the four existing work schedules. During and the appellant sometimes worked for seven consecutive days. Starting from , Varzim Sol modified the.
of the year, a half-day or a day of rest may be granted, apart from the country email list weekly day of rest provided by law. Article paragraph of that code provides: A period of hours is added to the mandatory weekly rest day, which corresponds to the minimum daily rest period provided for in Article . Article of the Portuguese Civil Code of provides at paragraphs and : . The worker is entitled to at least one rest day per week. . An additional weekly rest period, continuous or discontinuous, for all or some of the weeks of the year can be recognized through a collective bargaining instrument or under the employment contract. Paragraphs and of article of the mentioned code are drafted as follows: . The mandatory weekly rest period and the -hour daily rest period provided for in Article must be granted continuously. . The -hour period referred to in the previous paragraph is considered included, in whole or in part, in the additional weekly rest.
That is granted in continuation of the mandatory weekly rest. The actual situation The appellant in the main litigation, Mr. Maio Marques da Rosa, was employed from to – from , as a cashier – by the respondent company, Varzim Sol – Turismo, Jogo e Animação SA, which owns and operates a casino in Portugal. The casino is open every day for a certain number of hours, from afternoon to morning, with the exception of December and . On the date of the facts in the main litigation, the work schedule of the Varzim Sol employees who worked in the gaming halls provided for two consecutive days of rest. The cashiers, including the appellant, worked in rotation within the four existing work schedules. During and the appellant sometimes worked for seven consecutive days. Starting from , Varzim Sol modified the.